Ubisoft Shuts RedLynx, Axes 70 Jobs [2026]

Ubisoft told staff on October 14, 2026, that it has proposed closing RedLynx, the Finnish studio behind the Trials motorcycle series, while also cutting 70 jobs at Ubisoft Singapore. The announcement, reported first by Game Developer and GamesIndustry.biz, marks the French publisher’s latest round of studio consolidation in a restructuring push that has now stretched across more than a year.

The RedLynx proposal, if finalized, would end a 15-year run for the studio Ubisoft acquired in 2011. Up to 52 positions are on the line in Finland, pending a local change-negotiation process that has not yet concluded. In Singapore, the cuts are already confirmed: 70 roles have been eliminated at a studio Ubisoft describes as central to its global production map. Neither studio closure was framed by Ubisoft as a reaction to any single project’s performance, but the timing lands at a moment when the wider games industry is still absorbing a wave of layoffs that began in 2023 and has not meaningfully slowed since.

Google · Preferred Sources

Don't miss new tech stories on Google

Add TrendinTech once in the Google app and our stories appear in your news suggestions.

Add Now

What Ubisoft Announced on October 14

Ubisoft’s statement, shared with staff and later published by Nintendo Life, read in part: “Today, we informed our teams of a proposal to close RedLynx in Finland, subject to the local change negotiation process, which would affect up to 52 positions.” That phrasing matters. Finnish labor law requires employers above a certain size to run a formal consultation, called a “yhteistoimintaneuvottelu,” before any redundancy becomes final. Ubisoft’s own language, “a proposal,” signals the company has not yet closed the books on RedLynx, even if the direction of travel is clear.

Ubisoft Singapore’s situation is further along. The company confirmed 70 positions have been cut at the studio, which it says is intended “to align the studio with upcoming production needs.” Unlike RedLynx, there is no suggestion the Singapore studio itself is closing. Ubisoft said the location “remains an important part of Ubisoft’s global production organisation,” according to reporting picked up by outlets covering the story out of Southeast Asia.

Combined, the two actions affect as many as 122 people, a number that puts this restructuring round in the same conversation as some of the publisher’s larger cuts since 2023. Game Developer, which broke the story alongside GamesIndustry.biz, framed it as part of a wider pattern rather than an isolated incident tied to one unsuccessful release.

Inside RedLynx: 15 Years of Trials

RedLynx built its reputation on the Trials series, a physics-driven motorcycle platformer that started on PC and mobile before finding a long-term home on Xbox and PlayStation consoles. Ubisoft bought the studio in 2011, folding a scrappy Finnish indie outfit into one of the largest publishing operations in gaming. For over a decade, RedLynx operated as a mid-size studio known for a single durable franchise rather than a sprawling slate of titles.

That narrow focus is, in hindsight, exactly the kind of profile that makes a studio vulnerable during a corporate belt-tightening cycle. A team built around one franchise has fewer places to redeploy staff internally when that franchise isn’t generating a new installment. Ubisoft has not published a specific reason for the RedLynx proposal beyond the broader restructuring context, and any claim about why the decision was made beyond that remains unconfirmed. What is confirmed is the scale: up to 52 jobs, a number small next to Ubisoft’s total headcount of roughly 17,000 people worldwide, but significant for a studio of RedLynx’s size.

If the closure proceeds, RedLynx would join a growing list of acquired studios that Ubisoft has shuttered or folded into larger teams over the past three years, a pattern that stands in contrast to the acquisition-heavy growth strategy the company pursued through the 2010s.

Ubisoft Singapore’s Role in the Global Pipeline

Ubisoft Singapore has spent recent years as a support studio on some of the publisher’s biggest live-service and open-world projects, contributing engineering and production work across the Assassin’s Creed and other franchise lines. Its exact headcount before the cuts was not independently confirmed, but reporting from the region, including coverage from The Straits Times, characterized the 70 eliminated roles as a meaningful share of the studio’s local workforce rather than a marginal trim.

Ubisoft’s framing, that the changes align the studio “with upcoming production needs,” is standard corporate language for a restructuring tied to project staffing cycles rather than a wind-down. That distinction separates Singapore from RedLynx in this announcement: one studio is being resized to fit a pipeline, the other is facing a proposal to disappear entirely. Readers tracking the broader slowdown in hardware demand covered in our report on how console sales craters have hit Xbox and PlayStation will recognize the pattern: publishers are trimming headcount even as they insist individual studios remain strategically important.

Ubisoft’s Statement in Full Context

A Ubisoft spokesperson’s statement, as reported by Nintendo Life, struck a conciliatory tone: “We deeply value the contributions of both teams and recognize the impact this may have on our colleagues. We are committed to supporting our teams throughout this process and conducting it with care and respect.” That language mirrors statements Ubisoft has issued during prior rounds of cuts, a pattern that has become familiar to anyone who has followed the publisher’s restructuring announcements since 2023.

Engadget, which also covered the announcement, reported the same core figures: up to 52 positions at RedLynx and 70 at Ubisoft Singapore, for a combined total approaching 122 roles. Polygon’s coverage emphasized Ubisoft’s insistence that the Singapore studio remains a key part of its global production organization, a point the company appears eager to stress given the studio’s ongoing work on other projects.

How This Fits Ubisoft’s Broader Restructuring Timeline

Ubisoft has been in a state of near-continuous reorganization since early 2024, when the company first signaled that its cost structure needed to shrink in response to disappointing sales on major releases and a broader downturn in AAA publishing economics. The RedLynx and Singapore cuts extend that timeline into its third year, highlighting how long the current contraction cycle has run compared to past industry downturns, which typically resolved within 12 to 18 months.

Ubisoft is not alone in this. The games industry has shed tens of thousands of jobs since 2023 across publishers large and small, a trend our coverage of the 13-year low in PS5 and Xbox hardware sales connects to softening consumer demand on the hardware side. When console sell-through slows, publishers feel the pressure further up the chain, and studio-level headcount is often the first lever pulled.

Detail	RedLynx (Finland)	Ubisoft Singapore
Status	Proposed closure, not yet final	Confirmed reduction
Positions affected	Up to 52	70
Process	Local change-negotiation underway	Already implemented
Known for	Trials motorcycle series	Support work on major franchise titles
Acquired/established	Acquired by Ubisoft in 2011	Long-running regional studio
Announcement date	October 14, 2026	October 14, 2026

Comparing This Round to Ubisoft’s Other Recent Cuts

Ubisoft’s restructuring has touched multiple studios over the past two years, each time drawing a similar playbook: a formal statement citing alignment with production needs, a consultation process where local law requires one, and a company-wide note reiterating commitment to remaining teams. What differs this time is the specific combination of a full studio closure proposal (RedLynx) paired with a same-day reduction at a separate, larger studio (Singapore), rather than cuts concentrated in one location.

That dual-location approach suggests Ubisoft is managing its restructuring on a rolling basis across its global footprint rather than executing one large, single announcement. For a publisher with development studios spread across more than 15 countries, trimming in smaller, staggered rounds may be less disruptive to any single title’s production schedule, even if it extends the overall period of uncertainty for staff.

Market and Investor Reaction

Ubisoft’s stock has traded under sustained pressure for much of the past two years as investors weighed the publisher’s ability to deliver reliable hits outside of its core Assassin’s Creed franchise. Cost reductions tied to studio consolidation are typically read by markets as a sign management is tightening operating expenses, though they rarely move share price dramatically on their own unless paired with guidance changes. Ubisoft has not issued new financial guidance alongside this announcement, meaning the RedLynx and Singapore cuts should be read as operational housekeeping rather than a signal of a broader strategic pivot, at least based on what the company has confirmed publicly so far.

Industry analysts who track publisher cost structures have generally characterized Ubisoft’s multi-year restructuring as a catch-up exercise after a period of rapid studio expansion during the 2010s and early 2020s left the company with a larger global footprint than its current release cadence can support.

What Happens to RedLynx’s Trials Franchise

Ubisoft has not announced what becomes of the Trials intellectual property if RedLynx closes. Franchises in this situation typically follow one of three paths: the IP goes dormant indefinitely, remaining team members are folded into another internal studio that inherits the franchise, or the rights are licensed or sold to an outside developer. None of those outcomes has been confirmed by Ubisoft, and any claim describing a specific plan for Trials beyond the studio closure proposal itself is speculation at this point.

Fans of the series have reason for both concern and cautious hope. Concern, because studio closures frequently coincide with franchises going dormant for years, as has happened with other Ubisoft-owned series following prior restructuring rounds. Cautious hope, because the Trials brand retains a loyal niche audience and physics-platformer games remain a durable, low-cost genre to produce relative to Ubisoft’s bigger open-world productions.

Impact on Ubisoft Singapore’s Ongoing Projects

Ubisoft Singapore’s reduced headcount raises questions about delivery timelines for whatever projects the studio currently supports. Support studios of this kind typically contribute to engineering, quality assurance, and asset production rather than leading a title from concept to launch, which means a 70-person cut is more likely to show up as schedule pressure on partner studios than as a canceled project outright. Ubisoft’s statement that the studio “remains an important part” of its global production structure suggests the company intends to keep Singapore staffed for ongoing work, just at a smaller scale.

Readers interested in how publisher cost pressure intersects with release strategy may also want to track how other major franchises are handling delays and leaks during development, a dynamic we’ve followed closely in our reporting on Rockstar’s handling of GTA 6 leaks, where a competing publisher has taken a markedly different public communications approach during a high-stakes development cycle.

How Ubisoft’s Cuts Compare to Rivals

Ubisoft is far from the only major publisher trimming headcount through 2025 and into 2026. Microsoft’s gaming division, Sony’s PlayStation Studios, and Electronic Arts have all announced layoffs or studio closures over the past two years as the industry adjusts to slower hardware sales and rising development costs for AAA titles. Microsoft’s own pivot toward broader platform reach, which we covered in our look at Xbox Labs and its push into browser-based gaming, reflects a similar instinct among large publishers to diversify delivery methods and trim costs simultaneously rather than betting everything on traditional console hardware cycles.

Publisher	Recent Restructuring Signal	Primary Driver Cited
Ubisoft	RedLynx closure proposal, 70 cuts at Singapore (Oct. 2026)	Aligning studios with production needs
Microsoft Gaming	Multiple studio layoffs since 2023, platform diversification	Cost control, broader distribution strategy
Sony PlayStation Studios	Live-service project cancellations and studio cuts since 2023	Shifting investment priorities
Electronic Arts	Recurring layoff rounds tied to project cancellations	Portfolio consolidation

What sets Ubisoft apart Is the sheer duration of its restructuring. Where some competitors have executed a single large layoff round and then stabilized, Ubisoft’s cuts have arrived in waves stretching back to early 2024, suggesting the company is still working through a more fundamental mismatch between its studio footprint and its release pipeline.

Why Studio Consolidation Keeps Happening Industry-Wide

The underlying economics here are not unique to Ubisoft. AAA game budgets have climbed steadily for a decade, driven by rising art and engineering costs for open-world titles, while the number of games capable of recouping those budgets at launch has not grown at the same pace. Publishers respond by either canceling projects outright or consolidating the studios that supported those projects into leaner teams focused on fewer, larger bets. RedLynx’s single-franchise profile made it a more exposed target for this kind of math than a studio contributing to multiple active titles simultaneously.

Handheld and PC gaming’s continued growth, something we’ve tracked in comparisons like our look at the ROG Xbox Ally X20 against Valve’s Steam Deck OLED, hasn’t been enough to offset the pressure on traditional console-first publishers like Ubisoft, whose catalog still leans heavily on big-budget, console-anchored franchises rather than the smaller, higher-margin titles that thrive on handheld platforms.

What Happens Next in Finland

The Finnish change-negotiation process gives RedLynx employees and their representatives a formal window to discuss alternatives to closure, including redeployment to other Ubisoft studios, before any final decision is made. These processes can run for several weeks depending on the complexity of the case and the number of employees involved. Until that process concludes, RedLynx’s closure remains a proposal rather than a settled fact, a distinction Ubisoft itself has been careful to maintain in its public statements.

Historically, these consultation periods in Finland and similar jurisdictions across the European Union rarely reverse a company’s underlying decision, but they can affect severance terms, redeployment offers, and the exact timeline of any final closure.

Predictions for Ubisoft’s Next Moves

Based on the pattern Ubisoft has followed since 2024, a few outcomes look likely in the months ahead.

The RedLynx closure proposal will likely be finalized once Finland’s change-negotiation process concludes, following the same trajectory as prior Ubisoft studio closures.
Ubisoft will probably announce additional, smaller restructuring actions at other studios before its next fiscal year closes, continuing the staggered pattern seen since 2024 rather than one large consolidated cut.
The Trials franchise will most likely go dormant in the near term rather than being immediately reassigned to another internal studio, given Ubisoft has not signaled any transition plan.
Ubisoft Singapore will likely continue operating as a support studio at its reduced headcount, with its workload tied closely to whichever major franchise titles enter active production next.
Investor and analyst commentary on Ubisoft’s next earnings call will likely frame these cuts as incremental cost control rather than a signal of a larger strategic shift, barring any new guidance from the company.

The Human Cost Behind the Numbers

Every restructuring announcement reduces to a set of numbers in coverage like this: 52 positions here, 70 there, a combined total near 122. Behind those figures are developers, artists, and producers who built careers around a franchise or a regional studio that may no longer exist in its current form by early 2027. Ubisoft’s statement about supporting affected teams “with care and respect” will be tested in the specifics of severance packages, redeployment offers, and how quickly the company communicates final decisions once the Finnish consultation process wraps.

For an industry that has now endured more than two years of rolling layoffs, the RedLynx and Singapore cuts are unlikely to be the last such announcement from Ubisoft, or from its competitors, before the broader market for AAA game development finds a new equilibrium between budgets, headcount, and the number of titles the market can reasonably support.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is RedLynx definitely closing?
Not yet. Ubisoft has proposed the closure, but it is subject to Finland’s local change-negotiation process, which has not concluded as of this writing.

How many jobs are affected at RedLynx?
Ubisoft said the proposal could affect up to 52 positions at the Finnish studio.

How many jobs were cut at Ubisoft Singapore?
Ubisoft confirmed 70 positions have been affected at Ubisoft Singapore.

Is Ubisoft Singapore closing too?
No. Ubisoft said the Singapore studio remains an important part of its global production organization. Only staffing levels there are changing, not the studio’s operational status.

What games did RedLynx make?
RedLynx is best known for the Trials motorcycle platformer series, which it developed both before and after Ubisoft’s 2011 acquisition of the studio.

Why did Ubisoft make these cuts now?
Ubisoft has not detailed a specific reason beyond describing the changes as aligning its studios with upcoming production needs, part of a broader restructuring that has continued since early 2024.

What happens to the Trials franchise if RedLynx closes?
Ubisoft has not announced any plan for the Trials intellectual property. Past studio closures at the company have sometimes left franchises dormant for extended periods.

Is this part of a larger trend in the games industry?
Yes. Ubisoft’s cuts follow a broader pattern of layoffs and studio consolidation across major publishers since 2023, driven by rising development costs and softer console hardware sales.

Ubisoft Closes RedLynx, Cuts 70 Jobs in Singapore [2026]